That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

The basic shipping paper that forms an agreement between a shipowner and a charterer is a （）.

If the ship is delayed by reason of Charterer’s failure to name a port，（）will be liable for the damages.

The final inspection responsibility for seeing that a tank barge is provided with the required equipment and fittings in good and serviceable condition prior to loading cargo rests with the （）.

The fact that it has become impossible to procure a cargo （），as a rule，relieve the Charterer of liability.

The owner is not at liberty to leave the port of call as soon as the time specified in the charter-party has elapsed，though the Charterer may，if the contract so provides，be liable to compensate（）for the delay．

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

If the Shipowner agrees to the voyage originally ordered by the Charterer，he is entitled to be paid hire（）for the excess period.