If the ship is delayed by reason of Charterer’s failure to name a port，（）will be liable for the damages.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

We must take the Charterer’s benefit（）full consideration．

Unless otherwise agreed，（）must take the goods from alongside，though this obligation may be varied by a custom of the port which is not inconsistent with the express terms of the contract.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

To render the（）liable，the shipowners must show that the proximate cause of the detention or expense was trading to a river with a bar or to a port with a bar.

If the Charterer sends a vessel to an unsafe port，and she is damaged as a result，he will have to indemnify the（）.

The Shipowner must not stow goods on deck（）there is a trade usage to that effect or the Charterer has given his express or implied consent.

That the Shipowner has broken a condition precedent will（）the Charterer from the liability to provide a cargo.

If the Shipowner proves that prima facie the cause of damage was excepted，the burden ofproof shifts to（）.