The Charterers to have option of using Owners’ bunker contracts. This sentence indicates that（）.

The importance of the distinction between a charter by demise and a charter party proper（）that under the former the master is the agent of the Charterer，not of the Shipowner.

If the Shipowner has failed to carry out a term of a time charter-party whereby he undertakes to maintain the vessel in a seaworthy state，this only（）the Charterer to sue him for damages，and not to repudiate the charter-party.

If the vessel does not arrive by the canceling date，and the Charterer（）expenses，these expenses can be claimed by him from the Shipowner where they are in the reasonable contemplation of the parties.

The master’s authority to act in the interests of the cargo owner is part of his general authorityas servant of the Shipowner，and therefore（）will be liable if the master abuses his powers.

The right to limit liability in connection with the ship（）also extended to Charterers and any person interested in or in possession of the vessel and，in particular，any manager or operator of her.

The consignee’s refusal to take delivery，or failure to do so within a reasonable time，also puts an end to（）liability as a carrier.

The final inspection responsibility for seeing that a tank barge is provided with the required equipment and fittings in good and serviceable condition prior to loading cargo rests with the （）.

If the vessel is not discharged in the time stipulated in the charter-party，the Charterer renders（）liable to pay demurrage or damages for detention，as the case may be.

The fact that it has become impossible to procure a cargo （），as a rule，relieve the Charterer of liability.